Controversy analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Controversy analysis - Essay Example This essay reviews five articles on water scarcity and what they say or not say about wastewater management. Since water scarcity is growing day by day, being an important cause of the issue, can improvement in wastewater management help in solving the problem? As early as 1955, Packman argued that water scarcity is a national issue and must be resolved through policymaking, before it seriously derails the development of America, in the article, â€Å"Water for the Future.† He is an important source of information because he has presented an issue that not many reporters analyze and discuss during his time. Packman blames human mismanagement and the uneven distribution of fresh ground and surface water for water issues. He claims that the government and private sector should look into supporting diverse options to properly manage water scarcity, and these are: 1) efficient management of existing water resources; 2) reusing water, including wastewater; 3) increasing water suppl y through artificial rain production; and 4) improving research on water desalination. The strengths of the article are the use of authoritative sources and the emphasis on the issue and how to resolve it. Packer employs diverse credible articles to support his statements. For instance, he says: â€Å"Measures to combat water shortages must be based on consideration of the fact that water, unlike other resources, cannot be saved by non-use.† He supports this claim by providing evidence: â€Å"The conservation of water is not so much the saving of a decreasing' supply for some greater need in the future, as, for example, the storing of natural gas, but the control and use of water to the optimum advantage of all.† Packer gives proper in-text citation for his claims. Moreover, Packer effectively uses logos that can bring attention to urgency of water shortage. He underscores that water shortage is a reality, and to not manage water through different ways will result to d evelopmental and health catastrophes in the future. The weakness of the article is its lack of conclusion. Packer abruptly ends the article after discussing policy issues. He should have summarized his findings and discussed the implications of the policies and resolutions he proposed to increase the effectiveness of his argument. In â€Å"Global Water Shortages,† Mary H. Cooper expands the political implications of water shortages that Packard mentioned, and where she argues that the next wars and conflicts will not revolve around oil, but water, because of its scarcity and increasing demand from people of different nations and communities. She is an important source because she specializes in environmental, energy and defense issues (CQ Researcher). Before she joined The CQ Researcher as a staff writer in 1983, she worked as a reporter and Washington correspondent for the Rome daily newspaper l'Unita (CQ Researcher). Cooper claims that one of the most pressing underlying ca uses of territorial disputes is the shortage of water. Since countries are sharing water sources, they are doing everything they can to defend this basic need. She includes